An edited piece of this letter will run in Friday, August 31st's edition.
I’m writing this letter to the
editor today knowing full well that it won’t be popular, but then that’s one of
the many great aspects of the US,
our ability to speak up and voice our opinion, right? Since this spring in Kent there have been
many people speaking out on both sides of an issue concerning the relocation of
an ante-bellum home the was built for the sister of Marvin Kent, for whom the
city is named, as well as the Sherman and Wells families. The Kent Sherman Wells home had most recently
been a student rental on Erie
Street, and in need of demolition to make way for
the Esplanade extension planned by Kent
State University,
when its prestigious history was rediscovered by local citizen-historians.
As the spring and summer
progressed, the group looking to save the house- Friends of the Kent Sherman
Wells House, incorporated in July as Kent Wells Sherman House, Incorporated-
identified 247 North Water Street
as the site most feasible and working within the time constraints imposed by
the university. This site,
unfortunately, is currently used and maintained, with permission of the owner,
by Standing Rock Cultural Arts and the community, and has been such for two
decades. Once there was a purchase
agreement was in place for the land, the possible change of ownership and usage
was communicated to Standing Rock Cultural Arts. Thus began attempts by SRCA and community
members to try and help find an alternate location for the house, so as to
preserve both the house and the land between Scribbles and SRCA’s North Water Street
gallery.
There has been plenty written about
the two groups, and community members on either side of the issue, but what I
wanted to address here is the issue of the Planning Commission’s ruling in July
to not approve the site plan proposed by Kent Wells Sherman House,
Incorporated. The editorial board of the
Record Courier itself has written to compel the Kent Planning Commission to
overturn their verdict. Since that
ruling, the house has been temporarily moved so as to prevent its demolition,
allowing until December first of this year to find a location for the
house.
Much of the argument against the
Planning Commission’s ruling has rested on property rights, stating that this
ruling somehow restricts an owner’s ability to do with their land as they
wish. This is not the case for many
reasons. First and foremost, the land is
not currently owned by the group that had applied for the site plan; how can a
group not holding the land in question have their property rights infringed? There was no ruling that the current owner
could not sell the land to Kent Wells Sherman House, Incorporated, or anyone
for that matter, and the owner will not lose a sale of his property no matter
the outcome, as Standing Rock Cultural Arts and the community have raised money
to purchase the land from individuals and a matching grant from Kent
Cooperative Housing, if it remains undeveloped.
Another argument has been that the
Planning Commission exceeded its authority in this case, as part of the reason
for not approving the site plan was stated publicly as “community
opinion.” With regard to this objection,
it is important to remember that the Planning Commission is part of the Kent’s
Community Development Department, the body responsible for overseeing how this
town develops and changes. Part of the
Planning Commission’s role in this is to consider site plans for the
development of lots and judge accordingly, not simply to rubberstamp all
projects that come to them. The city’s
law director has stated that the Planning Commission was within their rights to
rule as they did, and that Kent Wells Sherman House, Incorporated had the right
to submit a new site plan, which they have done.
It’s important to remember that
this project is also using public funds, which gives added weight to public
opinion on the project, and those dollars come in the form of a grant not to
exceed $40,000 in moving costs from Kent State University, and a $15,000
unsecured loan from the city. In short,
this is our community, money from our taxes, and supposed to benefit the
community, giving the community a say in this project.
On the newly proposed site plan,
that will be considered at the September fourth meeting of the Planning
Commission, the significant difference that allows this to be re-considered is
the change in setback of the house.
Previously, Kent Wells Sherman House, Incorporated had sought a fifteen
foot setback to allow viewing of the mural on the building housing Scribbles
Coffee, but will now be seeking a sixteen inch setback, which will effectively
block the mural by Edwin George, Cherokee Elder and Ohio Arts Council Master
Artist. This change in setback goes
against the variance sought for the site from the Board of Zoning Appeals, and
against the recommendations of the new Architecture Review Board, both of which
have already approved the project. This
change in site plan calls into question whether or not this is a good-faith
change in the site plan, or simply a tactic to allow reconsideration, and could
open a dangerous precedent for ad nauseum site plan revisions that are
essentially the same, but tie up city resources in the approval process.
With the additional time available
while the house is temporarily housed on College and Haymaker, an alternative
location can be found (and some have already been identified) so that there is
no need to prioritize urban green-space, the arts, or historic preservation
over each other, but instead foster a city appreciation for all three. If the City is looking for and supports a
win-win solution as they say they do, they can step forward and help in this
process by offering land and/or assistance with utilities. Considering public opinion, the existence of
additional time, identified alternatives, and the lack of a legitimate legal
reason to do so, there’ is no reason for the Kent Planning Commission to change
its verdict in this case.
Lisa Regula Meyer, Kent
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete